Rick Scott signed the state’s budget for 2014-15 yesterday
including rewards galore for his republican buddies who salted it heavily with election
year goodies for the home boys. You can
count it as major political maneuvering and a down payment on his next
election. The difference between his
buying his election four years ago with $74 million of his own cash and this
one is, this time he’s using your taxes dollars to do it.
http://skyshadowphotography.blogspot.com/p/feather-wings.html |
It’s a bit disgusting the way state republicans, after three
years of gutting the state’s ability to manage and protect its natural
resources because, they said, the state had no money and had to tighten its
belt, they are now funding a boat load of local feel-good projects designed to
capture your warm and fuzzies, and your vote in November.
It’s so obvious and so disingenuous that, as I said, it’s
disgusting … and yet, will you vote for him nevertheless?
If you do, you will be endorsing one of the most destructive
periods in Florida’s recent history in terms of the harm that will be done to
Florida’s natural systems and, thus, to its long term economic future and
quality of life. You will also be
rewarding those who are responsible for dismantling the state’s long term
planning ability leaving the state’s future to be controlled and directed by land
developers, phosphate and rock miners, power companies and those who represent
themselves as farmers but who are often times nothing more than foreign
industrial magnates looking to make greater profits by further exploiting what’s
left of natural Florida.
As a voting public, I know long-term thinking isn’t a
strong suit of ours but November will be a critical decision point. Choose Rick Scott and the next four years
will forever cast in flint-hard stone the course he has set, which is to serve only
those special interests whose sole focus is making a return for shareholders
with no regard for the impact it will have on where you and I live, where our
children will live, and where their children will.
The Florida Conservation Coalition is one of the most responsible,
highly respected and influential environmental groups in Florida because it is
affiliated with many of the state’s most prestigious environmental
organizations and thousands of individuals including former Governor and U. S.
Senator, Bob Graham.
Yesterday it published a response to the $77 billion state budget
Rick Scott signed the same day. The FCC was
established and is now lead by some of the most dedicated and sincere people,
frankly, that I’ve had the honor to know in my 40-plus years of involvement
with natural resource management in Florida.
The response is remarkable because it is very carefully written to
reflect the intense dedication the organization has toward being truthful, accurate
and tough; a complex and difficult task given the diverse nature of its many affiliated
members and supporters whose often disparate positions must be respected.
I urge you to read it.
It is clearly a signal that this state’s environmental community is feeling
frustration, disappointment and certainly anger, that is perhaps too well
suppressed. I hope it will charge you
with the feeling that we cannot sit still and be quiet, because if it doesn’t, the
course of intentional environmental neglect Rick Scott has set for Florida will
forever change the tremendous natural heritage it has so generously afforded us,
and we will all be at fault.
Here’s the FCC’s response:
(Find the published version HERE)
Florida Conservation Coalition Response to
Governor’s Budget Signing
By
signing the FY 2015 budget Governor Rick Scott may attempt to take credit for
providing historic levels of funding for Florida’s springs and the
Everglades. In doing so, however, he will ignore the massive budget cuts
to water protection agencies and land conservation projects brought on by his
administration and the Legislature.
Governor
Scott was elected on the idea of reducing the size and cost of government. This
focus has been evident since the Governor signed his first budget in 2011, in
which he vetoed the entire $305 million annual appropriation for Florida
Forever and bragged of cutting $700 million more from Florida’s five water
management districts.
Cuts to
the Suwannee River and Northwest Florida Water Management District budgets
resulted in those two agencies postponing setting minimum flows for springs.
Cuts to the South Florida Water Management District, exceeding $200 million,
caused the agency to reconsider investments in the C-43 and C-44 reservoirs and
other Everglades clean-up work. These are the very same projects that the
current administration and Legislature are now funding in this year’s budget,
after several years of needless delay.
Unfortunately,
in light of these actions, claims that our freshwater springs and the renowned
Everglades are being saved by this budget may appropriately be viewed as
election year efforts to make voters forget the effects that previous budget
cuts and staff reductions have had on the programs and agencies responsible for
the health of our waters and protection of our natural lands.
To judge
the current administration’s commitment to environmental protection, recent
spending claims have to be weighed against past actions: Florida’s FY 2008
budget included $200 million for the Everglades and the Northern Everglades, in
addition to the more than $100 million spent that year on Everglades projects
by the South Florida Water Management District from its own budget. Additionally,
during the previous administration, the South Florida Water Management District
spent more than $500 million in one year buying land that will be used in a
program to expand water treatment and storage.
Along
with cutting water management district budgets, Governor Scott has consistently
refused to propose anything but minimal funding for the state’s land
acquisition programs which include projects to protect Florida’s springs and
buy at-risk wetlands and panther habitat in the Everglades. Previously, in a
single year, the Florida Forever program spent approximately $70 million on
protecting land that recharges Silver Springs, more than the entire statewide
appropriation for Florida Forever this year.
Prior to
2011, thirty percent of Florida Forever program funds were allocated to the
water management districts to purchase land to recharge water supplies, store
and treat floodwaters and protect our most vulnerable springs and rivers.
This year, however, Florida Forever allocations to water management districts
to protect water resources were not included in the Governor’s budget.
Instead the districts were allocated $20 million in previously
appropriated funds for land conservation.
Compared
to previous budgets by this administration, this one shows modest increases in
conservation funding. That said, it pales in comparison to the funding and
commitments to Florida’s water and land resources of past
administrations.
When I was growing up..Scott was something we flushed down the tolet. It's time to resume that practice.
ReplyDeleteThis past weekend the Republican Party leadership met to elect a new chair for the Republican Party of Florida. The lady elected enjoyed the endorsements of Senator John Thrasher and Governor Scott. Among other things, the lady elected was head of the Clay County Republican Party, which is part of Senator Thrasher’s District. Interestingly, the vote was 106 to 69, which means that in spite of Thrasher’s and Scott’s endorsement, the lady received only 60% of the vote. Another view would be that 40% of the votes were against Thrasher and Scott. This indicates to me that there are a few Republicans who have not drunk the Scott cool-aid and are independent thinkers. This is a good sign for Charlie Crist. Either way I believe that a majority of the voters will be voting for the candidate who will do the less damage to the State or the less of two evils as opposed to voting for one of the candidates.
ReplyDeleteVery well done Vergara and it is the absolute truth of the matter. These guys are sickening. And they are eaten up with themselves.
ReplyDeleteI recall an old Wizard of Id cartoon strip whereupon Sir Rodney and the King were having discourse about the plumber's union. The King opined that their demands amounted to a lot of money for just knowing water flowed downhill.
ReplyDeleteSir Rodney responded "Sire, water is not all that flows downhill."
To that point, it is a conundrum of sorts that the consensus of the Republican Party here in Florida seems to be "Change! While we're at it, let's hope it works out."
One historical benchmark of conservative politics has been the resistance to change while the liberal bench has been viewed as promoters of change. Hard to track who is what these days while they collectively oversee the destruction of our waters and natural systems.
Given the economic impact these resources have on Florida it is difficult to fathom why both parties are not falling all over themselves to protect and conserve. Yes, retirees vote. At the same time, pandering to that business plan in the same fashion as our grandfathers is myopic at best. It is also the economic model which places Florida near the bottom of the totem pole nationally, this from the perspective of domestic product and per capita wage.
Keep this in mind come November.
Dan H.